LITTLEBLACKDOG.COM

EEps · Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:36 pm Post subject: Firewire...

fer the win! Big Smile

Can you say up to 3.2Gbps? Wink Smile

Take that USB 2.0.... Evil Smile

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:57 pm Post subject:

USB 3.0 will be 4.7Gbps

http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2007/11/29/intel_seeks_usb_3_contribs/

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:35 am Post subject:

Oh yeah? Well superduperfirewire v9.23856729^7 is going to be a million-billion TB/sec...

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:17 am Post subject:

yeah... and firewire 3 will prolly still get sustained throughput higher than usb 3... just like in the usb2 vs firewire 1 world.

Guide Dog Joined: 08 Nov 2003 Posts: 8421 Location: MN

Slymer wrote:

yeah... and firewire 3 will prolly still get sustained throughput higher than usb 3... just like in the usb2 vs firewire 1 world.

fire 18, is going to be standard on all Play Station 24s

a cluster of which connected through said firewire, using a USB 19 keyboard and mouse combo for controlling it, will be used to finish what the PS3 started and finally cure cancer however the games will all suck even though they look better then real life, and every one will demand a Nintendo ViiiX (named after one of the developers tried to pronounce the roman numerals they were using to number it...)

Stray Dog Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Age: 30 Posts: 1

So, is firewire hdd enclosure has faster speed?

Thanks Cool

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:59 pm Post subject:

PeterMc wrote:
So, is firewire hdd enclosure has faster speed?

Thanks

yes, firewire hdd enclosure haz fastr speed.

generally with larger files as sustained throughput is better on firewire and with mass numbers of files. in the small files and short lists of files... they're generally the same unless you're dealing with old outdated USB 1.x which is slower than 3 week old constipation (yeah... I liken usb 1.x to crap... cause it pretty much is for use with large amounts of data) Very Happy

Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 3:40 am Post subject:

Slymer wrote:
PeterMc wrote:
So, is firewire hdd enclosure has faster speed?

Thanks

yes, firewire hdd enclosure haz fastr speed.

generally with larger files as sustained throughput is better on firewire and with mass numbers of files. in the small files and short lists of files... they're generally the same unless you're dealing with old outdated USB 1.x which is slower than 3 week old constipation (yeah... I liken usb 1.x to crap... cause it pretty much is for use with large amounts of data)

Don't fall for PeterMc. He's a viral marketer who was trying to plug some company. He's now earned a fair chunk of Hong Kong's IP space a ban, because he's changed providers. But 4 posters in 3 weeks have tried this.

At least this guy is teh amuzorx.

Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:42 am Post subject:

Well SquashWireTM will blow all of that away.

Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:50 pm Post subject:

EdisonRex wrote:
Slymer wrote:
PeterMc wrote:
So, is firewire hdd enclosure has faster speed?

Thanks

yes, firewire hdd enclosure haz fastr speed.

generally with larger files as sustained throughput is better on firewire and with mass numbers of files. in the small files and short lists of files... they're generally the same unless you're dealing with old outdated USB 1.x which is slower than 3 week old constipation (yeah... I liken usb 1.x to crap... cause it pretty much is for use with large amounts of data)

Don't fall for PeterMc. He's a viral marketer who was trying to plug some company. He's now earned a fair chunk of Hong Kong's IP space a ban, because he's changed providers. But 4 posters in 3 weeks have tried this.

At least this guy is teh amuzorx.

hence my first sentence... but just in case someone else had the same question... I gave my opinion