| Author |
Message |
twiztid
Cat Chaser


Joined: 01 May 2001 Age: 27 Posts: 837
Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:26 am Post subject: Optimize CIFS? |
|
Is it possible to somehow optimize CIFS on a WAN other than using some sort of WAN optimizer?
CIFS seems to like to eat my bandwidth a bit, I've talked with Communications at my corporate office asking them if they could enable CIFS compression/optimization on our WAN Optimizer, but they don't seem to want to do that for some reason.
Any thoughts on what I could do?
Screenshot from my optimizer.
This is inbound traffic over a 3 week period. |
_________________ "...your mouth is talking, you might want to see to that."
|
|
|
|
|
Skookum
Butt Sniffer


Joined: 26 Oct 2001 Posts: 1535
Location: I dunno, I lost my Mommy
|
Posted:
Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
To answer your question I have no clue if there is a way.
I was planning on doing a WAN optimization too, here in a few weeks. So I will take a look and see if I can find something.
But just as a note, if you do go with a WAN optimizer, I suggest against Riverbeds Steelhead devices. |
_________________ "Paranoia is no longer a mental illness it is a way of life" - Me
|
|
|
|
|
fear_nothing
Moderator


Joined: 07 Nov 2001 Posts: 2701
Location: The end of the internet
|
Posted:
Thu Dec 06, 2007 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
Blue Coat also does WAN optimization.... not an endorsement on my part |
_________________ -Fear
Remember when it comes to Security only the paranoid will survive….
Slashdot poster: I don't use commercial applications. I don't use programs for my security tests. I do the tests myself everyday.
Slashdot reply: You don't use programs? What, you put the cat-5 in your mouth and try to *taste* the intruders?
An infinite number of monkeys pounding away on keyboards will eventually produce a report showing that Windows is more secure and has a lower TCO, than linux.
|
|
|
|
|
twiztid
Cat Chaser


Joined: 01 May 2001 Age: 27 Posts: 837
Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted:
Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
I don't get the choice sorry to say. My corporate office issued me a Packeteer Packetshaper, one for each site. I know they do CIFS compression/optimization, I just don't have the access to them to set it up, and the guy that has the access won't do it for some reason.
He keeps telling me I need control my HTTP traffic before he'll do compression, even though you can see by that screenshot that normal HTTP traffic doesn't even make it into the top 10 protocols list for usage.
Oh, and he has access to these charts, they're created by the Packetshaper which he controls. |
_________________ "...your mouth is talking, you might want to see to that."
|
|
|
|
|
Slymer
Butt Sniffer


Joined: 29 May 2003 Age: 30 Posts: 1842
Location: chair in front of my computer
|
Posted:
Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
is there another head you can talk to that's higher than his?
that might light a fire under his arse... but may put you on his bad side in the future... but it may be worth a shot. |
_________________ The Sly One
======================================
Windows is like crack. It feels good, it's easy to start into, it hooks you bad, it costs a ton of money, and it makes you crazy. And you still love it. - EdisonRex
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Mahmoud
Cat Chaser


Joined: 24 Nov 2003 Posts: 851
Location: AE, Shj
|
Posted:
Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
with your disco cisco router, it's possible to enable interface-level compressions such as predictor/stack/etc but note that this is interface level and applies on all sort of traffic (not only cifs), also they will lead to more cpu/ram usage (predictor: more ram, fewer cpu. stacker: more cpu, fewer ram - depending on link speed)
IIRC the only sort of compression that you can apply it selectively (e.g. only applied on CIFS) is tcp or rtp header compression. this works well when you have lots of headers passing the link. lots of headers mean small payloads - good example is telnet where the payload is one byte, not sure how well this works with your CIFS traffic. |
_________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|