LITTLEBLACKDOG.COM Forum Index LITTLEBLACKDOG.COM

 
LWD LWD   FAQ FAQ   Memberlist Memberlist   Usergroups Usergroups   Active Topics Active Topics   Register Register  
  Profile Profile   Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages   Log in Log in  
  Who is Online Who is Online   Image Gallery Image Gallery   Chat Chat   Search Search  
  LWDGear       LBDGear  

View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topic     Reply to topic   LITTLEBLACKDOG.COM Forum Index » Networking
Author Message
Olive
Tail-Wagger
Tail-Wagger


Joined: 04 Mar 2001
Posts: 2214
Location: chicago

Post Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:03 am   Post subject: 3 wireless APs -> "1" Reply with quote Back to top  

I have a client that has 3 different locations, and a few employees who float from location to location.

They want to to go wireless for these mobile employees, and for easy of use, I am wondering if it's possible to give all 3 access points the same SSID and WPA key.

I'll find out one way or another for sure tomorrow, but maybe one of you have tried this in the past.

_________________
i'd never join an organization who'd have me as a member
Thawte Web of Trust Notary

--wonko "I really dont know what to say exept the purpose of a lake is not to kill someone."
--maple_shaft "I AM AN ATTENTION WHORE!!!!! "
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
anglachel
Guide Dog
Guide Dog


Joined: 08 Nov 2003
Posts: 8419
Location: MN

Post Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 7:35 am   Post subject: Re: 3 wireless APs -> "1" Reply with quote Back to top  

Olive wrote:
I have a client that has 3 different locations, and a few employees who float from location to location.

They want to to go wireless for these mobile employees, and for easy of use, I am wondering if it's possible to give all 3 access points the same SSID and WPA key.

I'll find out one way or another for sure tomorrow, but maybe one of you have tried this in the past.


Yeap very possible.

did it with my parents house, if you can get on at their place you can get on at mine.

_________________

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
Death to Shuttleworth!
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
EdisonRex
Lead Dog
Lead Dog


Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10154
Location: Not Moscow

Post Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:26 am   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

Yup. No real reason why not. It's no more, and no less secure, either.

_________________
Garret: It's so retro.
EGM: What does retro mean to you?
Parker: Like, old and outdated.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Olive
Tail-Wagger
Tail-Wagger


Joined: 04 Mar 2001
Posts: 2214
Location: chicago

Post Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:40 am   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

Thanks. I assumed it would work, but could also imagine that there might be an issue where the MAC of the AP doesn't match when moving from location to location, and for security reasons, might not allow a connection when using a single generic/universal profile on the laptops.


Never tired this before, so wasn't sure.

_________________
i'd never join an organization who'd have me as a member
Thawte Web of Trust Notary

--wonko "I really dont know what to say exept the purpose of a lake is not to kill someone."
--maple_shaft "I AM AN ATTENTION WHORE!!!!! "
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
EdisonRex
Lead Dog
Lead Dog


Joined: 06 May 2002
Posts: 10154
Location: Not Moscow

Post Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:32 am   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

It's a valid question.

But my understanding of wireless security, such as it is, usually implies that the MAC address of the AP is irrelevant.

_________________
Garret: It's so retro.
EGM: What does retro mean to you?
Parker: Like, old and outdated.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
the taz man
Butt Sniffer
Butt Sniffer


Joined: 16 Nov 2002
Age: 33
Posts: 1380
Location: CT, USA

Post Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:15 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

Mac address is only relevant if your limiteting what mac address can access the ap....... and at that point you can add all the mac addressesof the remote computers to each ap.

The only advantage of doing this is an additional level of security.

_________________
"It's not the size of the cat in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the cat."
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
a318a
Toilet Drinker
Toilet Drinker


Joined: 26 Oct 2000
Age: 35
Posts: 208
Location: Sumter SC

Post Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:04 am   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

I setup one of my customers with 3 wireless networks at different locations. I did NOT enter in the WPA key but I did enter the SSIDs for all three. I also created a MAC filter allowing only the machines at the locaions to access the WLAN including his laptop. The owner is able to travel from each location with no problems. All should be fine.

_________________
I wish you would find breathing boring and stop doing it.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Pakiii
Tail-Wagger
Tail-Wagger


Joined: 22 Jul 2002
Posts: 2097
Location: KS, USA

Post Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:10 am   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

Yep easy to do. I've got one setup similar here for contractors access to the internet (off the network). The building's too big (and dense) for one AP to hit all the places so we've got a couple AP's wired together with Fiber, with all of the same settings. So when the user walks around, one drops off and then it picks up the next one. Only problems I've had is the contractors who have Wireless NICs that don't support WPA, but only WEP. They get a wired connection instead (on that same LAN).

_________________
"Because men know that the conquest of one's own weakness is a far, far, more difficult task than any other, they tend to believe that he who can conquer himself can also conquer whatever problem is at hand" - Rear Admiral Harley Cope
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Olive
Tail-Wagger
Tail-Wagger


Joined: 04 Mar 2001
Posts: 2214
Location: chicago

Post Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:24 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

yeah i got this running no problem.

Due to security policies and regulations, they're legally obligated to have wireless connections encrypted. All three keyed the same way, and works like a charm.

_________________
i'd never join an organization who'd have me as a member
Thawte Web of Trust Notary

--wonko "I really dont know what to say exept the purpose of a lake is not to kill someone."
--maple_shaft "I AM AN ATTENTION WHORE!!!!! "
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
fear_nothing
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 07 Nov 2001
Posts: 2766
Location: The end of the internet

Post Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:41 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

Olive wrote:
yeah i got this running no problem.

Due to security policies and regulations, they're legally obligated to have wireless connections encrypted. All three keyed the same way, and works like a charm.


You should really try to sell your client on moving away from either straight WEP or WPA. You need to add another layer, WEP/orWPA with rotating key plus some kind of back-end authentication. Radius, taccas etc. Or go the cert route.

WEP has been broken for year, and all versions of WPA can be bruteforced Rolling Eyes

fly me up there and I'll show them just how broken WEP is...... Very Happy

_________________
-Fear

Remember when it comes to Information Security only the paranoid will survive….






Slashdot poster: I don't use commercial applications. I don't use programs for my security tests. I do the tests myself everyday.

Slashdot reply: You don't use programs? What, you put the cat-5 in your mouth and try to *taste* the intruders?

An infinite number of monkeys pounding away on keyboards will eventually produce a report showing that Windows is more secure and has a lower TCO, than linux.
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic     Reply to topic

View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
phpBB SEO
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

Help us keep advertisements off this site. Donate today!