LITTLEBLACKDOG.COM Forum Index LITTLEBLACKDOG.COM

 
LWD LWD   FAQ FAQ   Memberlist Memberlist   Usergroups Usergroups   Active Topics Active Topics   Register Register  
  Profile Profile   Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages   Log in Log in  
  Who is Online Who is Online   Image Gallery Image Gallery   Chat Chat   Search Search  
  LWDGear       LBDGear  

View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topic     Reply to topic   LITTLEBLACKDOG.COM Forum Index -> Operating Systems » OS - Linux
Author Message
creed
Veteran Dog
Veteran Dog


Joined: 08 Nov 2003
Age: 97
Posts: 6337
Location: Exiled

Post Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:45 am   Post subject: x64 based Linux distros, recommendations? Reply with quote Back to top  

Hey all

With some issues arising with BSd, I've got to look for some Linux distros to run the software that I need (mainly VMWare). Since i have a 64 bit processor in the machine that I'm using I'm looking for recommendations for a x64 bit distro to utilize it. Any suggestions?

_________________


The Seven faces of Creed



View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Jaymac
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 19 Dec 2002
Age: 21
Posts: 5582
Location: Port na Binne Uaine, Contae Dhoire, Éire

Post Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:27 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

I don't have any 64bit machines - well actually I do, but for some reason it has a 32bit distro on it... I reckon SUSE would probably be your best bet - anyone out there with a 64bit SUSE install?

_________________
Jaymac

"Software is like sex: it's better when it's free." - Linus Torvalds
"Ireland for the Irish, not for London or for Rome." - John Lennon

affabletoaster, Akely, AlexN, AnalogKid, anothersomeone, b-day girl, BamZipPow, blahpony, CheeseMonger The Great, dstg_II, Dutch, EdisonRex, eep, Elk, evilness, FatherBean, Fathertyme, Fido, horselady, je, jodygirl, KingKobra, krbshappy71, Lycander, mally, Murphy The Cat, nattiebo, OhioArt2, Olive, Pakiii, pastense, Quetzalcoatl, quijbe, Rahhstah, Rover, seca111, Skookum, sLaPpY, sully_51, Superdwarf, Tard, the taz man, Toast, Toxin, VirtualElvis, yiayia49



View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
blahpony
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 31 Jul 2002
Age: 36
Posts: 2657
Location: Crackrock-ville, MD

Post Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:18 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

I used to have a 64bit SUSE installed. I switched back to 32bit because of media codecs. That and flash. It seemed like too much of a mish-mash of 64 and 32bit software getting the multimedia to work properly. I would imagine if you didn't need that stuff it would work quite well. It was a very nice distro just didn't have all the shiny things I wanted.

_________________
Top of the 666 page!!!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
skildude
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 Feb 2003
Posts: 8019
Location: Texas: Land o' Religions

Post Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 8:16 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

After installing the Mandriva free 2k7 I can say I'm impressed. Its even better than the 2k6 version. comes with KDE 3.5.2

and you can D/L the 32/64 OS or the strict 64 bit OS. I recommend the Illinois D/L sites. THey have very fast d/l times.

_________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I decided to say something witty but am at a loss for words...

My clouds silver lining has been tarnished black . It still follows me around but makes outcomes a whole lot more grim.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
anglachel
Guide Dog
Guide Dog


Joined: 08 Nov 2003
Posts: 8419
Location: MN

Post Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 8:46 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

debian it's got every architeture you could want. (I don't know if it is 10 or 11 now adays... but more then most people will come across in their day to day wanderings)

_________________

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
Death to Shuttleworth!
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Doomhammer
Leg Humper
Leg Humper


Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 4702
Location: Utah

Post Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 2:11 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

Pretty much any Linux distro can run in x86_64.

My distro of choice is Gentoo, however. Smile

_________________
"The depth of your jealousy concerning my leetness astounds even me." - Ethan - CTRL+ALT+DEL
"Spare monies for a noob? Heal plz? How I mine for fish?" - Leo - VGCats # 160
"I hurt in my everywhere." - VGCats

Q: If a tree falls when nobody can hear it, does it make a sound?
A: Chuck Norris can hear it.


Lycander wrote:

see, the typical responses I see from Doomy follow a vein of: "wtf d00d, why are you doing it like that? do it like ME, because I'm ultimate roxxor LOLBBQ"


'Tis true LOL !
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
hummer010
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 Nov 2000
Age: 33
Posts: 4663
Location: Right here!

Post Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:11 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

anglachel wrote:
debian it's got every architeture you could want. (I don't know if it is 10 or 11 now adays... but more then most people will come across in their day to day wanderings)


Actually, Debian Stable does not have X64 support. It will as soon as Etch moves to stable, but at this time, there is no "official" x64 Debian support.

http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/

_________________
---------------------------
Where are you?



...remember second place is really only first loser!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
anglachel
Guide Dog
Guide Dog


Joined: 08 Nov 2003
Posts: 8419
Location: MN

Post Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:12 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

hummer010 wrote:
anglachel wrote:
debian it's got every architeture you could want. (I don't know if it is 10 or 11 now adays... but more then most people will come across in their day to day wanderings)


Actually, Debian Stable does not have X64 support. It will as soon as Etch moves to stable, but at this time, there is no "official" x64 Debian support.

http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/


yeah but no one actually uses debian stable...

_________________

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
Death to Shuttleworth!
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Lycander
Lead Dog
Lead Dog


Joined: 24 May 2002
Age: 25
Posts: 12198
Location: The Constitution State

Post Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:43 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

anglachel wrote:
yeah but no one actually uses debian stable...

Actually ISPs that use Debian are using the stable branch. Our web host from way way back did.

_________________
To the top of hunger mountain
I found my solitary ways
Where I could live on nuts and honey
And take my shelter in a cave
View user's profile Send private message
hummer010
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 Nov 2000
Age: 33
Posts: 4663
Location: Right here!

Post Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:08 am   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

anglachel wrote:
hummer010 wrote:
anglachel wrote:
debian it's got every architeture you could want. (I don't know if it is 10 or 11 now adays... but more then most people will come across in their day to day wanderings)


Actually, Debian Stable does not have X64 support. It will as soon as Etch moves to stable, but at this time, there is no "official" x64 Debian support.

http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/


yeah but no one actually uses debian stable...


Unless he's putting it on a server. Then he probably wants stable. This is one of the things I love and hate about Debian. When Debian labels something as stable - it is damn stable. Unfortunatly by the time something gets to stable, its rather outdated. The default install for Sarge includes the 2.4 kernel. You can install 2.6, but you have to select it.

My server runs sarge.

_________________
---------------------------
Where are you?



...remember second place is really only first loser!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
anglachel
Guide Dog
Guide Dog


Joined: 08 Nov 2003
Posts: 8419
Location: MN

Post Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:44 am   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

hummer010 wrote:
anglachel wrote:
hummer010 wrote:
anglachel wrote:
debian it's got every architeture you could want. (I don't know if it is 10 or 11 now adays... but more then most people will come across in their day to day wanderings)


Actually, Debian Stable does not have X64 support. It will as soon as Etch moves to stable, but at this time, there is no "official" x64 Debian support.

http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/


yeah but no one actually uses debian stable...


Unless he's putting it on a server. Then he probably wants stable. This is one of the things I love and hate about Debian. When Debian labels something as stable - it is damn stable. Unfortunatly by the time something gets to stable, its rather outdated. The default install for Sarge includes the 2.4 kernel. You can install 2.6, but you have to select it.

My server runs sarge.


only reason to use stable is IF your putting it on a server... And even then unstable will work, if you get the right snapshot of the software, just don't for the love of god use testing...

_________________

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
Death to Shuttleworth!
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
hummer010
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 Nov 2000
Age: 33
Posts: 4663
Location: Right here!

Post Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:53 am   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

anglachel wrote:
hummer010 wrote:
anglachel wrote:
hummer010 wrote:
anglachel wrote:
debian it's got every architeture you could want. (I don't know if it is 10 or 11 now adays... but more then most people will come across in their day to day wanderings)


Actually, Debian Stable does not have X64 support. It will as soon as Etch moves to stable, but at this time, there is no "official" x64 Debian support.

http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/


yeah but no one actually uses debian stable...


Unless he's putting it on a server. Then he probably wants stable. This is one of the things I love and hate about Debian. When Debian labels something as stable - it is damn stable. Unfortunatly by the time something gets to stable, its rather outdated. The default install for Sarge includes the 2.4 kernel. You can install 2.6, but you have to select it.

My server runs sarge.


only reason to use stable is IF your putting it on a server... And even then unstable will work, if you get the right snapshot of the software, just don't for the love of god use testing...


I agree completely. If you want stable, then use stable. If you don't feel the need use stable, there is no point in using testing, go straight to unstable. I run sid on both my laptop and desktop, and I haven't had any issues - well, I had a bitch of a time getting the ATI fglrx driver installed on my desktop, but I'll blame ATI for that, not Debian.

As far as I know, it isn't too long now until Etch becomes stable. Then Debian will have an official stable x64 version.

_________________
---------------------------
Where are you?



...remember second place is really only first loser!
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
anglachel
Guide Dog
Guide Dog


Joined: 08 Nov 2003
Posts: 8419
Location: MN

Post Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:14 am   Post subject: Reply with quote Back to top  

hummer010 wrote:
anglachel wrote:
hummer010 wrote:
anglachel wrote:
hummer010 wrote:
anglachel wrote:
debian it's got every architeture you could want. (I don't know if it is 10 or 11 now adays... but more then most people will come across in their day to day wanderings)


Actually, Debian Stable does not have X64 support. It will as soon as Etch moves to stable, but at this time, there is no "official" x64 Debian support.

http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/


yeah but no one actually uses debian stable...


Unless he's putting it on a server. Then he probably wants stable. This is one of the things I love and hate about Debian. When Debian labels something as stable - it is damn stable. Unfortunatly by the time something gets to stable, its rather outdated. The default install for Sarge includes the 2.4 kernel. You can install 2.6, but you have to select it.

My server runs sarge.


only reason to use stable is IF your putting it on a server... And even then unstable will work, if you get the right snapshot of the software, just don't for the love of god use testing...


I agree completely. If you want stable, then use stable. If you don't feel the need use stable, there is no point in using testing, go straight to unstable. I run sid on both my laptop and desktop, and I haven't had any issues - well, I had a bitch of a time getting the ATI fglrx driver installed on my desktop, but I'll blame ATI for that, not Debian.

As far as I know, it isn't too long now until Etch becomes stable. Then Debian will have an official stable x64 version.


no etch is being pushed through right now, haven't gotten to a package freeze yet, but etch should be 2.6.18 from what I was reading... and all of the module packages are being compiled against that and tested with it.

_________________

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
Death to Shuttleworth!
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic     Reply to topic

View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
phpBB SEO
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

Help us keep advertisements off this site. Donate today!