LITTLEBLACKDOG.COM

EEps · Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 9:31 pm Post subject:

squashman wrote:
So does this mean that we would be able to Dual Boot Windows and OS X?

Why didn't Apple do something Bold and do the announcement with AMD! IBM had a hand in AMD's latest chips and has similarities with the PowerChip. Kind of a slap in the face for AMD.

Probably not... Sad Smile

Quote:
However, Schiller said the company does not plan to let people run Mac OS X on other computer makers' hardware. "We will not allow running Mac OS X on anything other than an Apple Mac," he said.

Leg Humper Joined: 16 Jan 2002 Posts: 5483

Well, remember roads run both ways.
I think you'll be able to install Windows on the Mac-tel.

Quote:

... saying there are no plans to sell or support Windows on an Intel-based Mac
"That doesn't preclude someone from running it on a Mac. They probably will,"

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:55 am Post subject:

They did demo running OS X on a 3.6Ghz Intel P4..
good thing they apologized for their toasting the P2.

I don't see this move as a bad thing for Apple either...

Leg Humper Joined: 16 Jan 2002 Posts: 5483

Neither do I. I'm looking forward to the products unveiling and I have never owned or been a fan of a mac.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 5:59 pm Post subject:

BamZipPow wrote:
squashman wrote:
So does this mean that we would be able to Dual Boot Windows and OS X?

Why didn't Apple do something Bold and do the announcement with AMD! IBM had a hand in AMD's latest chips and has similarities with the PowerChip. Kind of a slap in the face for AMD.

Probably not...

Quote:
However, Schiller said the company does not plan to let people run Mac OS X on other computer makers' hardware. "We will not allow running Mac OS X on anything other than an Apple Mac," he said.

What do they mean NOT ALLOW. I they going to write that into the License agreement. I think they are going the wrong way with this if they still want to continute controlling the hardware. I think they would seel more units if it was AMD based.

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:26 am Post subject:

I DONT SEE THE BIG DEAL WENT TO HOWARD UNIVERSITY AND PLAYED WITH THE MAC OSX FOR ABOUT 3 HOURS.....

THE COMPUTER SEEMS TO USE ALMOST ALL MICROSOFT WINDOWS PROGRAMS IN THE FIRST PLACE.....

WHAT ALL WE DO FOR THE MOST PART IS GO TO INTERNET, TYPE UP EMAILS AND BUSINESS LETTERS AND WATCH MOVIES BEHIND CLOSED SHADES IN OUR OFFICES.....

OPS FORGOT ALSO COLLECT VIRUSES.....

SO NOW THE MAC WILL BE HIT BY THOUSANDS OF VIRUSES IN THE FIRST MONTH GO FIGURE......

LATER........ Wink

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:38 am Post subject:

yooeinstein wrote:
SO NOW THE MAC WILL BE HIT BY THOUSANDS OF VIRUSES IN THE FIRST MONTH GO FIGURE......

Good one chief, you're a funny guy Smile

But that's not how it works.

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:39 am Post subject:

At least their CAPS LOCK won't be stuck.

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:07 am Post subject:

Ummmm... lets see...

I'm actually excited about this. Looking forward to hacking past whatever locks they put in place to ensure it is only installed on Apple hardware... I wish they would just release it already, and give M$ some real competition. As long as they are tied exclusively to one bit of hardware windows doesn't really have anything to worry about...

Linux had better get its' act together if they want a shot at the desktop... Time's running out. Everyone is tired of the security issues in XP, Longhorn is becoming a bit of a running joke (dropping features, delaying release dates, etc...) and Linux has a prime chance to really shine if they can get the desktop in order. Pick one (kde or gnome... quit arguing about which is better) and just unite behind it and make it the best desktop ever. They are ahead of others in some regards... but overall still running in 3rd place to OSX and Windows...

Who cares whether it is on Intel or AMD??? I likely won't be buying their hardware... And generally speaking anyway... x86 is x86...

And how is running OSX on x86 hardware going to suddenly make them innundated with virii?? Linux runs on x86 and doesn't have any issues there... It is the software, not the hardware that is the target...