| Author |
Message |
fear_nothing
Moderator


Joined: 07 Nov 2001 Posts: 2766
Location: The end of the internet
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 13, 2003 4:39 am Post subject: ISA server question |
|
ISA server [integrated mode] --> firewall
We are using an ISA server in integrated mode, used only to cache web pages. We have several other devices used for perimeter protection. Normal web browsing, http, https, and FTP work great. However the server has problems with sites that are using non-standard http ports. It's an easy fix, simply allow the ISA server to exit the network on other ports rather than the standard http/s ftp ports. But I'm not a fan of having to open a hole [port]the firewall every time we run across a site that is non-standard.
Within the ISA server can I make use of port-forwarding to send outbound traffic destined for port 8080 out port 80? Is this possible? say yes please |
_________________ -Fear
Remember when it comes to Information Security only the paranoid will survive….
Slashdot poster: I don't use commercial applications. I don't use programs for my security tests. I do the tests myself everyday.
Slashdot reply: You don't use programs? What, you put the cat-5 in your mouth and try to *taste* the intruders?
An infinite number of monkeys pounding away on keyboards will eventually produce a report showing that Windows is more secure and has a lower TCO, than linux.
|
|
|
|
|
Webster
Guide Dog


Joined: 16 Feb 2002 Age: 28 Posts: 8701
Location: Vacationland
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 11, 2004 1:53 pm Post subject: Re: ISA server question |
|
|
|
|
|
tecgod13
Tail-Wagger


Joined: 13 Aug 2002 Posts: 2866
Location: Western Massachusetts
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 11, 2004 10:24 pm Post subject: Re: ISA server question |
|
Webster wrote:fear_nothing wrote: say yes please
yes please may I have another
D'oh! I screwed up, lemme try again...
Would you please stop digging up this old crap.
Unless you have a good answer, this seems like to me, not to mention annoying. |
_________________ "The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?"
http://www.livejournal.com/users/tecgod13/
|
|
|
|
|
BamZipPow
Alpha Dog


Joined: 02 Aug 2001 Posts: 18018
Location: Driving EEp all over the place...
|
Posted:
Wed Feb 11, 2004 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
I say it's time to tie a rubber band around his balls and let them drop off... |
_________________ BamZipPow
...all yer EEps belong to Bam!
     
|
|
|
|
|
fear_nothing
Moderator


Joined: 07 Nov 2001 Posts: 2766
Location: The end of the internet
|
Posted:
Thu Feb 12, 2004 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
Well since you guys dug this one up... I still haven't found a way to solve my problem. Still open to suggestions. WOW a spam post that actually did some good!
Thanks Webster |
_________________ -Fear
Remember when it comes to Information Security only the paranoid will survive….
Slashdot poster: I don't use commercial applications. I don't use programs for my security tests. I do the tests myself everyday.
Slashdot reply: You don't use programs? What, you put the cat-5 in your mouth and try to *taste* the intruders?
An infinite number of monkeys pounding away on keyboards will eventually produce a report showing that Windows is more secure and has a lower TCO, than linux.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|