| Author |
Message |
BamZipPow
Alpha Dog


Joined: 02 Aug 2001 Posts: 17505
Location: Driving EEp all over the place...
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:38 am Post subject: If dual cores are good... |
|
Quad cores have to be better...  |
_________________ BamZipPow
...all yer EEps belong to Bam!
     
|
|
|
|
|
Mit
Toilet Drinker

Joined: 24 Apr 2004 Posts: 193
Location: Lancashire
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 08, 2006 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
pitty most microsoft software isn't designed to work with em yet.
Linux however |
_________________ Mit / Tim
UK TV Guide - http://tv.igoe.me.uk/
Feedjuggler - http://www.feedjuggler.co.uk
In 2010, M$ Windows will be a quantum processing emulation layer for a 128-bit mod of a 64-bit hack of a 32-bit patch to a 16-bit GUI for an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor from a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
|
|
|
|
|
Akely
Moderator


Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Age: 42 Posts: 5911
Location: Sweden
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
Mit wrote:pitty most microsoft software isn't designed to work with em yet.
Linux however 
How about Windows Server systems?
/Akely |
_________________ Can't you see?
It all makes perfect sense,
expressed in dollars and cents,
pounds, shillings and pence.
Can't you see it all
makes perfect sense?
|
|
|
|
|
sLaPpY
Cat Chaser


Joined: 04 Sep 2004 Age: 31 Posts: 854
Location: Land O' Potato
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 08, 2006 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
Akely
Moderator


Joined: 16 Nov 2002 Age: 42 Posts: 5911
Location: Sweden
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
sLaPpY wrote:Akely wrote:
How about Windows Server systems?
/Akely
BLASPHEMY!
/me covers in shame. |
_________________ Can't you see?
It all makes perfect sense,
expressed in dollars and cents,
pounds, shillings and pence.
Can't you see it all
makes perfect sense?
|
|
|
|
|
Mit
Toilet Drinker

Joined: 24 Apr 2004 Posts: 193
Location: Lancashire
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 08, 2006 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
Akely wrote:Mit wrote:pitty most microsoft software isn't designed to work with em yet.
Linux however 
How about Windows Server systems?
/Akely
They should be just thrown in the bin |
_________________ Mit / Tim
UK TV Guide - http://tv.igoe.me.uk/
Feedjuggler - http://www.feedjuggler.co.uk
In 2010, M$ Windows will be a quantum processing emulation layer for a 128-bit mod of a 64-bit hack of a 32-bit patch to a 16-bit GUI for an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor from a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
|
|
|
|
|
Lycander
Lead Dog


Joined: 24 May 2002 Age: 25 Posts: 12196
Location: The Constitution State
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 08, 2006 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
Still, with 4 cores you could just run multiple VMs and have multiple instances of an OS running at the same time. Virtualization I think they call it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
anglachel
Guide Dog


Joined: 08 Nov 2003 Posts: 8331
Location: MN
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 08, 2006 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
so is this like how many blades you can put no a razor? is there really any limit? or are you just going to bleed to death at a certain point? |
_________________
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
Death to Shuttleworth!
|
|
|
|
|
iceman
Cat Chaser


Joined: 18 Feb 2001 Posts: 953
Location: San Diego
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
Mit wrote:pitty most microsoft software isn't designed to work with em yet.
Linux however 
Actually, WinXP and WinServer2k3 should work just fine... as long as the license level is appropriate.
But with AMD and Intel going more for parallel cores, MS is going to have to re-eval their licensing structure.
iceman |
_________________ --
If you lived here, you'd be home now
Yep - I did 10K WU for SETI, have you?
|
|
|
|
|
creed
Veteran Dog


Joined: 08 Nov 2003 Age: 97 Posts: 6325
Location: Exiled
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
Lycander wrote:Still, with 4 cores you could just run multiple VMs and have multiple instances of an OS running at the same time. Virtualization I think they call it.
ye[p. it's big news, at least where I am. Persoanlyl I find it both good and dodgy |
_________________
The Seven faces of Creed
     
|
|
|
|
|
creed
Veteran Dog


Joined: 08 Nov 2003 Age: 97 Posts: 6325
Location: Exiled
|
Posted:
Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
iceman wrote:Mit wrote:pitty most microsoft software isn't designed to work with em yet.
Linux however 
Actually, WinXP and WinServer2k3 should work just fine... as long as the license level is appropriate.
But with AMD and Intel going more for parallel cores, MS is going to have to re-eval their licensing structure.
iceman
or they could be asshats and watch UNIX take more market share |
_________________
The Seven faces of Creed
     
|
|
|
|
|
anglachel
Guide Dog


Joined: 08 Nov 2003 Posts: 8331
Location: MN
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
creed wrote:iceman wrote:Mit wrote:pitty most microsoft software isn't designed to work with em yet.
Linux however 
Actually, WinXP and WinServer2k3 should work just fine... as long as the license level is appropriate.
But with AMD and Intel going more for parallel cores, MS is going to have to re-eval their licensing structure.
iceman
or they could be asshats and watch UNIX take more market share 
where do I put my vote for asshats? |
_________________
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
Death to Shuttleworth!
|
|
|
|
|
sLaPpY
Cat Chaser


Joined: 04 Sep 2004 Age: 31 Posts: 854
Location: Land O' Potato
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
Mit
Toilet Drinker

Joined: 24 Apr 2004 Posts: 193
Location: Lancashire
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
creed wrote:iceman wrote:Mit wrote:pitty most microsoft software isn't designed to work with em yet.
Linux however 
Actually, WinXP and WinServer2k3 should work just fine... as long as the license level is appropriate.
But with AMD and Intel going more for parallel cores, MS is going to have to re-eval their licensing structure.
iceman
or they could be asshats and watch UNIX take more market share 
they're gonna have to re-think it - and fast
I can see they'll try and charge more for a 'decent' pc sooner tho
suffice to say, i won't be giving them any more cash. I'll just use Linux wherever I can |
_________________ Mit / Tim
UK TV Guide - http://tv.igoe.me.uk/
Feedjuggler - http://www.feedjuggler.co.uk
In 2010, M$ Windows will be a quantum processing emulation layer for a 128-bit mod of a 64-bit hack of a 32-bit patch to a 16-bit GUI for an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor from a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
|
|
|
|
|
williamv
Stray Dog

Joined: 01 Feb 2006 Posts: 44
|
Posted:
Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
Mit wrote:creed wrote:iceman wrote:Mit wrote:pitty most microsoft software isn't designed to work with em yet.
Linux however 
Actually, WinXP and WinServer2k3 should work just fine... as long as the license level is appropriate.
But with AMD and Intel going more for parallel cores, MS is going to have to re-eval their licensing structure.
iceman
or they could be asshats and watch UNIX take more market share 
they're gonna have to re-think it - and fast
I can see they'll try and charge more for a 'decent' pc sooner tho
suffice to say, i won't be giving them any more cash. I'll just use Linux wherever I can 
From what I hear from our MS rep they have already thought this through and will be licensing per socket rather than per core. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|