LITTLEBLACKDOG.COM

for Windows are here

http://www.guntec.de/Crunch3r/boincx86.html

they are base of the narpast Linux Client

http://naparst.name/

for Info, first Install the latest offical Version and then the speziall Files

Benchmark on my Athlon64 3.200+ not overclocked

23.11.2005 22:25:40||Benchmark results:
23.11.2005 22:25:40|| Number of CPUs: 1
23.11.2005 22:25:40|| 2727 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
23.11.2005 22:25:40|| 8793 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
23.11.2005 22:25:40||Finished CPU benchmarks

for Info

Sir Ulli

Moderator Joined: 05 Dec 2000 Posts: 5941 Location: USA

Thank you Sir - Athlon 64 X2 3800+ onboard here - w Big Smile

f!

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 9:18 pm Post subject:

AMD Anthlon64 3200

Quote:
2005-11-10 20:52:25 [---] 2095 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
2005-11-10 20:52:25 [---] 3853 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

from log prior to optimizing

Quote:
11/27/2005 11:12:38 PM|| 2800 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
11/27/2005 11:12:38 PM|| 8202 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
optimized.
I noticed the huge change in Dhrystone but a small increase in Whetstone

Wonder if this is normal

seems after the Benchmark that my time for each seti unit went from ~2.5 hours to 1 hour 52 minutes. that is quite a shave!!!

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:09 am Post subject:

well after running overnight it appears that the optimizing did little to change my work time/WU

5 times · Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 9:05 am Post subject:

it takes time for a collection of wus to get credit ...
check your wus list to see how much different the requested time is compared to before

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:21 am Post subject:

i was getting claimed credits of over 50 pts/ WU. This as I've noticed is incredibly high considering that most Intel Boxes range from 15-25 credits/WU. THe high end results may even get me bumped from recieving credits. As of yesterday, Optimization is off and the latest Boinc download is on

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:21 pm Post subject:

latest Info for the spezial Cache Version

http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=arbeitvorher4gj.jpg

on an AMD Athlon64 3700+ (SanDiego) running at 2880 MHz watercooling

if all goes well, this Version goes out next Week.

Sir Ulli

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:35 pm Post subject:

thats incredibly fast but what do your claimed credits appear?

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 3:30 am Post subject:

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=318394&offset=80

my Athlon64 3.200 not overclocked

with the Spezial cache Version

more Info

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=23746

Sir Ulli

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 11:54 am Post subject:

once again I got results that were to say the least, bad.
Returning a claimed credit of 65 is a far cry from "normal" claimed credits. I think i forgo anymore "optimized" Boinc managers and just run standard

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 3:09 pm Post subject:

skildude wrote:
once again I got results that were to say the least, bad.
Returning a claimed credit of 65 is a far cry from "normal" claimed credits. I think i forgo anymore "optimized" Boinc managers and just run standard

for Info

Computation credit

http://boinc.berkeley.edu/credit.php

Credits have been validated

http://boinc.berkeley.edu/intro_user.php#credit

so your credit is going through 3 Users

for Info

User 1 Credit 10.0
User 2 Credit 30.0
User 3 Credit 50.0

you became only a validatet Credit of 30....

for Info

Sir Ulli

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:13 pm Post subject:

Sir ulli i understand How credit is applied but i also know that if one's results are far from the average then the results may be discarded by seti. This is also a science project as well. Bad science is as bad as no science. SO i would rather return results that I know are accurate. even though I get claimed results around 30/WU, this is far better than the 50+ that the optimized results were trying to return.

Again if my results are so far off then they are of little value to the project and I just as well not do the work

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 11:18 am Post subject:

are there still WU problems with these optimized clients?